How To Get More From Books You Read.
When we read a novel, there is no need to think about our approach to it. However, when it comes to understanding and selecting information from text quickly, we need to check our approach.
In order to get more from books, you need to read actively and learn some basic reading rules.
The first thing you should know is that reading is an active task, not a passive one. You can see it like a ball game where one party throws the ball, and the other party has to make an effort to catch it. That is, the “catcher” – or reader – has to make an effort in order to understand what the author is trying to convey.
This means that you can’t be lazy and expect all the relevant information to flow to you immediately. Getting what you want from a book requires work and, just as with any other activity, if you're going to become a highly proficient reader, you must learn and practice the skills involved.
In the ball game example, you become a skilled catcher if you know the game's rules and if you commit to practising.
So, what must you do to become a good reader?
Master different reading levels, from the more superficial to the involved and analytical.
Elementary reading: before you analyse a book, you have to understand it at the basic grammar and vocabulary level.
Remember your early days at school, when you had to read seemingly meaningless sentences such as “The cat sat on the mat”? Without realising it, you took the first steps toward mastering elementary reading.
Elementary reading is when the reader can decipher and comprehend words and sentences in a text. Here, the reader asks themselves the question, “What does the sentence say?”
For example, when children first learn to read, they’re reading and understanding the text by linking symbols on a page to sounds to form words and sentences. When they can do this, they can then understand the essential content of those sentences.
In other words, they understand that the letters “c,” “a”, and “t” sound like they do in the word “cat,” that this word is connected to others to form the sentence “The cat sat on the mat,” and finally, that this sentence relates to the image of a cat sitting.
All this seems glaringly obvious, doesn’t it? But the key to understanding all texts well depends on mastering this skill. If you don’t know what words and sentences are communicating, you will not be able to go beyond the very surface of the contents of a book or even grasp its basic meaning.
For example, imagine reading a book on cats without knowing the word “cat.” It would simply make no sense.
So, the next time you have to analyse a text, make sure you understand all the basic concepts from the start.
Analytical reading: When you start analysing a book, you should first identify its central theme and the author’s aim.
Once you’re familiar with a book, begin reading analytically. Analytical Reading is much like chewing and digesting the contents of a book.
The first step in this process is to find out what kind of book you’re reading and how its themes connect. Since the way themes develop depends on the book's topic, it is important to classify the book.
If you already know that the book is theoretical, you know that the argumentation will tend to be quite abstract compared to a how-to book. A mathematics book, for example, will not contain life advice, as a self-help book would. Keeping the main aim of the book in mind will help you later on when you’re combing through its more complex parts.
The fastest way to classify a book is to look at its superficial properties, such as the language it uses or simply its title. For example, a practical book will likely contain modal words like “should” or “ought to.”
Similarly, if you see a book with the title The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, you’ll know at once that it’s a history book.
After you’ve classified the book, it’s time to focus on the text itself. At this point, you need to identify the plot and note how different themes relate to the whole. This involves summarising its story and identifying the various themes or subplots of the text in a few short sentences.
For example, the storyline of The Odyssey would be something like “The tormented return of a Greek hero to his homeland.” Its outline would list the main events of the story, such as “1. Odysseus leaves the island of Calypso, 2. His son sets out to find him,” and so on.
This type of book analysis is like taking an x-ray: you have to discover its nature by looking at its “bones” – the plot. And then you can look at its “flesh” – the structure and subplots.
Understand the author.
An author is a seller of ideas, and to judge whether they are offering us quality material, we need to understand their basic vocabulary and argumentation. The best way to do this is by pinpointing the concepts or terms central to the text.
To do so, you need to identify keywords and to understand their meaning. Spotting keywords is especially easy in textbooks, as they are often marked graphically with an underline or in bold. The author will also likely define them early in the text.
To understand the keywords and the terms, you must look at the surrounding words. These, together with the context, will help you disambiguate their meaning.
When you are finished with the terms, you can begin to identify the author’s message, which means finding the propositions in the text and how they are structured into arguments. You can recognise a proposition as an answer to a question, a declaration of knowledge, or as an opinion. These will be found in the key sentences of the text and will contain notable terms. Propositions convey the main messages of the argument.
There are no hard-and-fast rules to identify propositions, however. Ultimately, it is up to the reader to grasp the structure of the argument and identify the key points.
To check whether you have understood what the author is trying to say, you should be able to rephrase these key sentences in your own words.
When you have done this, you should find out how they are connected and organised. For example, does the second proposition follow logically from the first? Did the author present their main argument and then provide examples or vice versa?
Following these steps will help you clarify what is being said and how it is being said.
When you analyse a book, you should evaluate its significance and logic.
Once you have understood the author's ideas, you can judge the quality of the content. This is the final step of evaluation in the book analysis.
Evaluating the significance of a book means asking yourself the questions “Is it true?” or “What of it?”
In order to address these questions, you must take a critical look at the text using a technique that involves criticising the book in a balanced and fair way.
For instance, you are not in a position to criticise if you haven’t understood what the author said or if you become too emotional over the argument! If you conclude that the argument is compelling, it is obviously acceptable to agree with the author – you needn’t disagree purely on principle.
However, if you have solid grounds to disagree, you should do so. One of these criticisms might be that the author is uninformed or misinformed. Take Darwin’s On the Origin of Species. Here, it would be fair to criticise the writer’s ignorance of genetics and the mechanisms of inheritance, which were discovered after he wrote the book.
Another criticism could be that the argumentation is illogical. For example, if an author says one thing at one point in the book and then contradicts this statement later on. This can be found in Thomas Hobbes’s famous philosophical tract Elements of Law, which states at the beginning that bodies of matter have no qualities such as odour, taste, colour and so on. Later in the text, however, Hobbes writes that men have qualities and are bodies of matter. This is an apparent contradiction of the author’s initial argument.
Other holes may be found in incomplete arguments or failing to address the problems outlined at the beginning of the text.
Syntopical reading: you can simultaneously apply your reading expertise to several books on the same topic.
When you need to write an essay for a class, you won’t base it on one book but rather pick and choose from several different sources. This is what the top-level technique – syntopical reading – is all about.
Syntopical reading involves reading two or more books on the same subject during the same time period. When you read this way you must be able to identify the topic you want to write about and select the relevant passages.
So what is the best way to do this? Well, syntopical reading is achieved through the use of inspectional and analytical reading. This means identifying appropriate books for your essay by looking at the titles, the covers and the indices of different books.
Once you’ve inspected the text, it’s time to use some analysis. For an essay, you will need to understand what different authors say about a specific topic and how this is developed in the literature. This requires a more thorough analytical approach in order to gain a deeper knowledge of the ideas put forward.
The main difference between syntopical reading and using individual inspectional and analytical reading techniques by themselves is that with syntopical reading, your topic is the one that is being investigated, rather than the topic of any individual book. Remember, you’re trying to answer a question and form an opinion on a topic on which there might be various perspectives.
Therefore, forming a complete picture of the whole book is unnecessary, unlike during analytical reading. It will be enough to simply read the passages that are relevant to your essay.
You should adapt the rules to different genres and seek external help when it’s needed.
The advice given so far consists of effective guidelines for approaching a new text. But each genre, or even each book, is a different world in and of itself. Because of this, it’s a bad idea to follow the rules blindly. Instead, you should rather apply the rules using common sense.
Bear in mind that each genre contains within it different structures and motivations. For instance, the “So what?” question will not apply in the same way to a novel as it would to a text on ethics. In fact, for a story, what counts is your own experience of the book and its impression on you – there isn’t always a universal moral for every reader.
The structure you want to look for in each genre will also differ. For example, in philosophy texts, you can anticipate an explicit sequence of propositions and arguments. On the contrary, in history texts, you can expect an analysis of historical facts.
Aside from adopting different rules to different genres, sometimes just reading the book isn’t enough to understand it. In this case, you’ll have to use your experience and other books to help you.
It may help, for example, to pay attention to the order in which the books of one author were written, as they may develop early ideas in subsequent works. This means that you’ll only sufficiently understand the book you’re reading if you know its background from other texts. Take the American Constitution. It’s based on Enlightenment ideas that were developed in the eighteenth century. So, to fully appreciate such notions as the pursuit of happiness, it’s necessary to be familiar with the works of philosophers like Montesquieu and Rousseau.
Thanks for reading!
We Are Seed Publication!
We make enriching posters for condominiums in Malaysia, building communities and spreading insights that matter to people.
More Articles:
Contact us: